In eternity before the Big Bang.
Sometimes I talk to myself (they say it’s normal)… 🤭🌌

“Let’s ‘create’ a universe unlike anything we know. Imagine space as nothing more than pure energy potential—just space and energy. Can you picture it?”

Yes, I can imagine space as pure energetic potential—without specific objects, particles, or defined structures. A homogeneous, isotropic expanse where energy isn’t localized but rather permeates the entire space in the form of potential. It could be described as a dynamic “ocean” of energy that interacts and shifts forms.

In this n-dimensional space, energy fluctuates and interacts. These interactions give rise to random rotations, leading to the formation of new forms of energy—perhaps even static ones. After a few sleepless nights (where darkness is all around), the potential for attraction increases, and small clusters are consumed by larger ones, until a few massive, rotating energy giants emerge. They are far enough apart not to influence each other directly.

The largest cluster, through the rotation imparted to it by energy transforming its potential, begins to experience gravitational effects—centrifugal and centripetal forces. As the cluster densifies under its own gravity, it starts pulling on nearby clusters with lower gravitational influence. Gravity and density grow.

A vast interplay of information begins to emerge, interacting wherever opportunities arise. The potential of gravity and energy expands, consuming everything within its reach. It absorbs the energy, gravity, and, most importantly, the informational potential of the affected clusters and objects.

Gravity eventually becomes so strong that it forms a rotating accretion disk, swallowing any object that drifts close enough to fall under its influence. Streams of radiation erupt from the objects, feeding and shaping the n-dimensional space.

At some point, gravity becomes so extreme and unstable that it collapses—BAM! The universe, as we know it, begins to exist.

Far from its “mother,” the first fluctuations and interactions start occurring within the surrounding energy field…

Do you like this theory?

You surely know the equation of the General Theory of Relativity.

Who wouldn’t know it? E = mc². So brilliant. However, it has a fundamental problem for me. This equation represents a fundamental principle, and up to this point, everything is correct—principally. But if you want exact data, you’ll quickly realize that Einstein defined it using ideal conditions—ideal vacuum, rest mass… conditions that simply don’t exist anywhere in the universe. And believe me, I’ve looked everywhere—twice. If you want to calculate the speed of light using this equation, you’ll even find time (t) appearing in it—some distance over some duration. Time does not appear anywhere in the equation, yet it becomes the resultant of the speed of light. Time, then, is merely a construct… perhaps just to make calculations easier, to help us visualize things better. I understand speed as the energy (Joule) required to move by 1 meter – J/m.

My theories are not fond of giving space to such constructs. Time… spacetime… why? The more these constructs are used, the less understandable physics becomes. I can explain the entire universe using only elementary physics—the law of action and reaction and the law of conservation of mass. The universe works exactly like a cup of tea that you stir with a teaspoon. There’s a lot happening, yet you feel like you see nothing.

For several months now, I’ve been exploring the accretion disk, passing through the Event horizon to the body of the Black hole and back. The speed of light is simply not a constant value. It never was. It’s merely a relationship between mass and energy. I have studied all the available information on experiments with BSE, the Harvard experiment from 1999, light dispersion experiments, experiments at the hadron collider, I have calculated electrons, protons, neutrons, and neutrinos—everything… as far as the internet allowed me to go.

A particle carries its information with it constantly, no matter where it is… it only interacts with the surrounding environment. Do you want exact data and theories whose validity does not end at the event horizon?

!!! Define the environment in which the particle moves !!!

Einstein ring? So easy! Gravitational lens? It is the logical behavior of particles. Singularity? There’s no such thing. A black hole as the most massive object? Don’t make me laugh. The real magic lies in the accretion disk. The very core of the black hole is nothing more than the waste of the accretion disk.

It’s as simple as a cup of tea. But I’m just an amateur photographer and a wannabe philosopher, so what do I know, right?! I’m Isolated observer…

Life doesn’t end when your time (t) is up, but when you run out of energy (E). Stay energized, dear ones 💖.